Speaking of dependable. This is just a shameless commerical plug for my 73. If anyone is looking for a really nice, dependable 73, this is it. Many IMLers have seen and driven this car. http://dte.net/57imperial/73imperial/ Kerryp --- dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > There is a 74 Imperial for sale by a former member, > Steve from Albany. He is > temporarily out of the IML. He calls himself "Otis > Davinson". He can be > reached at: > > Otis Davidson <otisdavidson@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > I have not seen this car, but my guess is its in > very good condition. Mike > Pittinaro has seen the car, and I am sure he will > agree. > > The advantage of 69-73 and 74-75 Imperials is that > they are quite cheaper than > the 66-68s. The 69-71 should still have strong > performance, just like the > earlier cars w/ 440s. Later cars lost some > performance, but I am sure they are > refined a bit more. > > D^2 > > Quoting Matt Hopkins <mhoppy@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > I concur with the other replies. I happen to have > a 66 and a 75. both > > fine > > cars and very reliable, with mechanical parts > readily avail except for > > rear > > rotors for 74-75. calipers and pads are easy to > get as well. These > > cars > > also have all the modern conveniences. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Eugene" <comp837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:28 AM > > Subject: IML: 1966-1975 Imperial reliability > > > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > I am interested in these cars and I am wondering > what strengths and > > > weaknesses these cars have. Also how easy are > parts to get for the 440 > > V8 > > > and the Torqueflite transmission and driveline > parts in general. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eugene > > > > > > > > > > > > > >