Speaking of dependable. This is just a shameless
commerical plug for my 73. If anyone is looking for a
really nice, dependable 73, this is it. Many IMLers
have seen and driven this car.
http://dte.net/57imperial/73imperial/
Kerryp
--- dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> There is a 74 Imperial for sale by a former member,
> Steve from Albany. He is
> temporarily out of the IML. He calls himself "Otis
> Davinson". He can be
> reached at:
>
> Otis Davidson <otisdavidson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I have not seen this car, but my guess is its in
> very good condition. Mike
> Pittinaro has seen the car, and I am sure he will
> agree.
>
> The advantage of 69-73 and 74-75 Imperials is that
> they are quite cheaper than
> the 66-68s. The 69-71 should still have strong
> performance, just like the
> earlier cars w/ 440s. Later cars lost some
> performance, but I am sure they are
> refined a bit more.
>
> D^2
>
> Quoting Matt Hopkins <mhoppy@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > I concur with the other replies. I happen to have
> a 66 and a 75. both
> > fine
> > cars and very reliable, with mechanical parts
> readily avail except for
> > rear
> > rotors for 74-75. calipers and pads are easy to
> get as well. These
> > cars
> > also have all the modern conveniences.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Eugene" <comp837@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:28 AM
> > Subject: IML: 1966-1975 Imperial reliability
> >
> >
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > I am interested in these cars and I am wondering
> what strengths and
> > > weaknesses these cars have. Also how easy are
> parts to get for the 440
> > V8
> > > and the Torqueflite transmission and driveline
> parts in general.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eugene
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >