Dick, yes, I'm talking about the tube, or sheath, that the antenna itself is in. Not the motor housing. It appears as if it came from a car that was hit in the fender there and it bent in the tube a bit (about 1/2" maybe), but the antenna itself is great. I have removed every bolt on it I can and the sheath won't budge. Is there some trick to getting the sunuvagun off? Thanks, Mark Dick Benjamin wrote: > I'm pretty sure the two years and all the radios are the same. > > Any dent in the sheath for the mast will cause the unit to have problems > extending all the way. If by housing you mean the circular part in which > the nylon cord is wound up, I doubt a small dent there would cause a > problem. > > You can take it apart and inspect it, and probably find the problem > yourself. You may be able to work something up inside the sheath to reduce > or eliminate the obstruction. Without seeing it myself, I can only guess > how bad it is. I've repaired this type antenna myself. If the chrome is > nice, it is worth saving. > > Dick Benjamin > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark McDonald" <tomswift@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:37 PM > Subject: IML: 67 vs. 68 antenna > > > I am trying to replace the antenna on my '68 with a used antenna that > > someone on the IML sold me (unfortunately, it was a year ago and I can't > > remember who it was), and the motor works fine but the anteena will not > > go up all the way. It jams at the last segment and makes a sound as if > > it is hitting something. However, as far as I can tell, there's nothing > > external obstructing the antenna. I have WD-40'ed the heck out of it to > > no avail. > > > > The anteena housing has a slight cup shaped bend in it about halfway up; > > could this be causing the problem? > > > > At any rate, I may be able to get an antenna from a '67. Are they the > > same as the ones on the '68? > > > > Thanks, Mark > > > > P.S.: This is for an AM/FM radio. > > > > > >