Re: Re: IML: Classic?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: IML: Classic?



You are close Mark, the criteria are very specific, but the list of true 
"Classic Cars" was not open to additional vehicles being added in the future. I 
am thinking that was the point of the Milestone Car Society.

Paul

In an email dated Fri, 12 Mar 2004 5:15:46 pm GMT, <tomswift@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
writes:

>I agree, the term "classic" has been degraded to the point that it is almost 
>meaningless 
>now, in my opinion.  After all, we have Coke "Classic" and Apple calls its 
>last operating 
>system, which is only about 2-3 years old, "Classic mode," etc., etc.  I think 
>it all depends 
>on age, too.  I once heard a guy in his 20's refer to an 80's model car as a 
>"classic."  
>Maybe to him!  :)
>
>I think the Classic Car Club of America is the group that really started using 
>that term, or 
>at least made an attempt to define it, and I'm sure that definition is printed 
>somewhere.  
>Just being old does not automatically make something a classic!
>
>(Unless we are talking people!)
>
>If I recall their definition there were several requirements.  In order to be 
>considered a 
>classic, a car had to:
>
>1.  Be the first of a series or the last of a series (the first 300, the last 
>Imperial convertible)
>and/or
>2.  One of the models from a distinguished line of models (any Duesenberg, 
>etc.)
>and/or
>3.  represent a significant technical or styling advancement
>and/or
>4.  represent a desirable "only" of anything-- e.g., the only turbine car, the 
>only Corvette 
>with a split rear window, the only year XZY option appeared, etc.
>
>Please go easy on me, this is from memory!  (Fuzzy memory, at that)
>
>To be "collectible" there were other criteria, like popularity.  Many folks 
>will call a car a 
>classic when in truth it is really more of a collectible.  An example would be 
>a Gremlin.  
>Not really an outstanding car for any reason, so it can't be a classic.  But 
>it's unique and 
>sort of interesting, so it's definitely collectible.
>
>Maybe someone can find these definitions and reprint them here.
>
>Mark M
>> From: Mike Pittinaro <mechimike@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 2004/03/12 Fri AM 10:45:54 EST
>> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: IML: Classic?
>> 
>> > I am always amazed at just how loosely the term
>> > "Classic" is used, especially in advertisements like
>> > this. They do the same thing with "Antique". These
>> > terms and another one (Milestone) are very specific
>> > definitions that apply to specific "eras" of
>> > collectible automobiles. 
>> 
>> The abhorrent condition of that '68 'vert
>> notwithstanding (I didn't even notice the harvest gold
>> carpetting, i was looking at the car on my projector
>> which is only a 800x600 res), I thought that a 68
>> Imperial would qualify as a Classic.  In the state of
>> Maryland, you can get Historic plates for anything
>> older than 25 years, or older than 20 years if it is a
>> discontinued model.  I thought that 25 years was the
>> threshold for "Classic".  Antique I profess to know
>> nothing about, but I thought it was something like 50
>> years old...again, these definitions I am thinking of
>> refer to a car's age, not to the time period during
>> which they were made.  I guess, using my logic, in
>> 2040 a 1990 Ford Taurus (if there are any left) will
>> be an Antique.
>> 
>> =====
>> --Mike Pittinaro
>> 
>> One point eight litres
>> Stromberg carburators sing
>> Loose nut at the wheel
>> 
>> __________________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for faster
>> http://search.yahoo.com
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
>> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
>> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
>> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>> 
>> 
>
>
>
>-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
>This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
>reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
>shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.