Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest



I agree, I can't make sense out of just a reply without at least the message it was a reply to. The previous messages leading up to the reply might not be relevant and can be deleted without losing the flow of the thread.

John McCann

Wilbur, Washington

Picture site:

http://community.webshots.com/user/metralla2

Rich -

Some folks, like me, may want to read the whole thread, especially if
someone is responding to something posted several days ago. If I post 'I
agree with Rich' in reply to something already posted, most folks want to
see what I'm agreeing with, without having to dig out the original post
which they may have deleted already.

Ron

----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich" <RJZ123@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest



  People - - Please TURN OFF the "attach original message" when replying
to the list.  Too much is being re-posted.  Thanx.   Now -  proceed with
the fun.

*************************************************************


To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.