Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest

[John McCann <jmccann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

   I agree, I can't make sense out of just a reply without at least the 
message it was a reply to. The previous messages leading up to the reply 
might not be relevant and can be deleted without losing the flow of the 
thread.

John McCann

Wilbur, Washington

Picture site:

http://community.webshots.com/user/metralla2

> Rich -
>
> Some folks, like me, may want to read the whole thread, especially if
> someone is responding to something posted several days ago. If I post 'I
> agree with Rich' in reply to something already posted, most folks want to
> see what I'm agreeing with, without having to dig out the original post
> which they may have deleted already.
>
> Ron
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rich" <RJZ123@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [FWDLK] L-FORWARDLOOK Digest
>
>
> >   People - - Please TURN OFF the "attach original message" when replying
> > to the list.  Too much is being re-posted.  Thanx.   Now -  proceed with
> > the fun.

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1