Re: Need a new Toy?

[Roger Pettigrew <dodger7998@xxxxxxx>]

Ok,,,,,,, I looked up some pics. of it,,,,,, it appears that the left  half 
 of both carbs are mainly feeding one bank, and the right half of both  are 
feeding the other,,,,,,,, guess it gives them bragging rights to call it  
whatever they want, but to me,,,,,, a crossram is not an inline,,,,,,,Sorry 
to  have been ignorant of their naming
 
 
In a message dated 5/4/2011 10:53:39 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx writes:

Indy  refers to it as an "In-Line Cross Ram".

Below is a comparison of the  manifolds.  Looks like the Tunnel Ram won  
out.
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0911_intake_mani
fold_tests/index.html

-  Jim
Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
'63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
'63  Polara 500 (383)
'65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
'71 Bronco

On  Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Roger Pettigrew <dodger7998@xxxxxxx>  
wrote:
>
>
> Ok,,,,,will take your word for it,, would have  to see the intake it self 
to
>  understand,,,,,,, sure looks like  an inline set up to me
>
>
> In a message dated 5/3/2011  11:14:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx  writes:
>
> actually  that is a cross ram.  that is the  indy cylinder head x-ram,
> and is the  hot ticket for nostalgia  super stock  racing.
>  http://www.usaperform.com/indy-chrysler-cross-manifolds-p-231.html
>
>  On  Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Roger Pettigrew  <dodger7998@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Nice toy,,,,,,,makes me wonder what the real  story is on cars that  are
>> obviously misdescribed in their  description,,,,,,, that  is definitely
> not a
>> crossram on it, so makes  me  wonder what else is not being seen
>>
>>
>> In a  message  dated 5/1/2011 4:03:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>>  shelby_nut@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>
>  
http://ontario.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-classic-cars-1963-plymouth-savoy-W0
>>  QQAdIdZ279189587
>>
>>
>> --
>>  [Non-text portions of this  message have been  removed]
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Please address  private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly  to that  person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and  
negotiations
> as well as  other personal messages only to the  intended recipient, not 
to
> the Clubhouse  public address. This  practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total  volume of  mail and fine tune the content signal to 
Mopar topic.
>  Thanks!
>>
>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion  Guidelines:
>>  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>>
>>
>>
>
>  --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail --  mail of interest to only one person -- 
directly to that person.  I.e.,  send parts/car transactions and negotiations 
as well as other personal  messages only to the intended recipient, not to 
the Clubhouse public address.  This practice will protect your privacy, 
reduce the total volume of mail and  fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. 
 Thanks!
>
>  1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and  
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.

--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.