From: Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Need a new Toy?
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, May 5, 2011, 5:23 AM
Stan,
How long are the runners in a stock Poly dual quad intake
or the Weiand
single four Poly intake?
Gary P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan Kafouse" <skafouse@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Need a new Toy?
So... how tall is this "tunnel ram"? Carb
and air cleaner will take what
eight inches themselves? Plus clearance so engine can
torque over and not
hit hood. Is it an individual runner or common plenum?
Those short runners
will have no bottom end, and if manifold is any good at all
will flow more
than any poly head ever did. Got a cam and convertor to
match intake? Sounds
neat, dont think it will work, cept for some wow factor.
--- On Wed, 5/4/11, Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> From: Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Need a new Toy?
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 9:38 PM
>
> Yes, I don't think any modern intake can beat a Tunnel
Ram
> for Max HP & Torque, even the "old school"
Weiands...of
> course a tunnel is not a user-friendly manifold for
the
> average Hot-Rodder due to height (for one) which
requires no
> hood or a cut-out for clearance.
>
> I will be running a Tunnel Ram on my Poly but I
designed
> the manifold to fit under the hood...of course I have
more
> hood clearance than most people (approx. 16" from top
of
> block face) so I can get away with a "tall enough"
> tunnel ram to make it effective and still have the
stealth
> factor.
>
> Gary Pavlovich
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Altemose"
<jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Need a new Toy?
>
>
> Indy refers to it as an "In-Line Cross Ram".
>
> Below is a comparison of the manifolds. Looks like
> the Tunnel Ram won out.
> http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0911_intake_manifold_tests/index.html
>
> - Jim
> Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
> '63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
> '63 Polara 500 (383)
> '65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
> '71 Bronco
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Roger Pettigrew
<dodger7998@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok,,,,,will take your word for it,, would have to
see
> the intake it self to
> > understand,,,,,,, sure looks like an inline set
up to
> me
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 5/3/2011 11:14:58 A.M.
Central
> Daylight Time,
> > mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx
> writes:
> >
> > actually that is a cross ram. that is the indy
> cylinder head x-ram,
> > and is the hot ticket for nostalgia super stock
> racing.
> > http://www.usaperform.com/indy-chrysler-cross-manifolds-p-231.html
> >
> > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Roger Pettigrew
<dodger7998@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Nice toy,,,,,,,makes me wonder what the real
story
> is on cars that are
> >> obviously misdescribed in their
description,,,,,,,
> that is definitely
> > not a
> >> crossram on it, so makes me wonder what else
is
> not being seen
> >>
> >>
> >> In a message dated 5/1/2011 4:03:10 P.M.
Central
> Daylight Time,
> >> shelby_nut@xxxxxxxxx
> writes:
> >>
> >>
> > http://ontario.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-classic-cars-1963-plymouth-savoy-W0
> >> QQAdIdZ279189587
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of
interest to
> only one person --
> > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations
> > as well as other personal messages only to the
> intended recipient, not to
> > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy,
> > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
the
> content signal to Mopar topic.
> > Thanks!
> >>
> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest
to
> only one person -- directly to that person. I.e.,
send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as
other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not
to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
only one
> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as
other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not
to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network